Gaming
In gaming, the press and the players are the same audience: the outlets covering a launch are read by the exact people deciding whether to play it. That makes credibility with games journalists and content creators unusually direct in its commercial effect, and makes a pitch that doesn't understand the genre or the community a fast way to be ignored.
Launch windows, where timing against a release date is unforgiving and coverage has to land in a narrow window before and around it. Major updates, esports tournament announcements and partnership reveals, each of which has its own outlet ecosystem and its own expectations for how the news is framed. And the ongoing work of building relationships with content creators and streamers, who now shape a launch's reception as much as traditional press does.
The audience for gaming coverage is also the audience for the game itself, which means credibility with the press and credibility with players are close to the same thing. A pitch that reads as marketing language rather than genuine understanding of a genre or its community gets noticed immediately, and not favourably. That makes gaming PR less forgiving of generic positioning than most other sectors.
It's a genuine bridge between two of our practice areas: the same outlet relationships and launch-moment discipline that apply to traditional game PR apply to GameFi titles, while our crypto and Web3 PR experience covers the token and community mechanics a Web3 game also needs explained credibly to press and players who are often sceptical of both categories at once.
FAQ